It isn’t the $50 million dollar question. This should be a cake walk for a Harvard grad. So why can not this man who claims to have been born here, not prove that he was and is Constitutionally able to be President?
Why use an act of congress, backed by NO authentic evidence whatsoever, to establish that which would be easily proven (or disproved) by the release of ALL Obama birth, adoption, college and passport records? What’s in these records that Obama is afraid to release for public access?
H.R. 593 passed with 56 co-sponsors, 220 Democrat YEAs, 158 Republican YEAs and NO NEAs… What’s with the unanimous congressional rush to end the debate over Obama’s sealed records? What happened to the “transparent president” promise?
The real truth actually does exist and it most likely exists in Obama’s official birth, adoption, college and passport records, [Not some silly symbolic House resolution] – all of which remain under lock and key, under Obama’s orders.”
Instead of simply opening those records and ending the debate, Obama has chosen to spend a million bucks keeping those records locked up and now, House members have decided to pass a non-binding resolution declaring Obama a “citizen” without first demanding to see the evidence necessary to prove their claim.
This is the stuff that real conspiracies are made of…. It’s not a “theory” that the Natural Born Citizen clause is a Constitutional requirement for the presidency, it’s a reality.
It’s not a theory that Obama’s records will either prove or disprove his eligibility for office, it’s a fact.
And it’s not a theory that when someone works this hard to hide something, there must be something worth hiding….
CBS News reports – “Gibbs lashed out Monday at the so-called “birthers” who believe President Obama is not a legal U.S. citizen despite overwhelming evidence to the contrary.”
Notice the absence of the term “natural born citizen.” Gibbs and CBS both know that we are NOT discussing “legal US citizenship” but rather the Founder’s “natural born citizen” requirement, unique to the Oval Office. They also know that these two terms have VERY different meanings and purposes. Still, Gibbs tries to deflect the debate to one over “US citizenship,” and CBS quickly follows his lead.
Further, what Gibbs and the mainstream press agree is “overwhelming evidence” – is THREE different COLBs (certificates of live birth) presented by Team Obama, and TWO different hospitals, named by Obama as his official place of birth.
No mention of the sworn affidavit signed by Obama’s family in Kenya, which states that they were present at Obama’s birth in Kenya, or the fact that not a single hospital in Hawaii will confirm that Obama or his mother ever entered the door of their facility.
No mention of the fact that Obama was adopted and became a legal citizen of Indonesia in his youth. No mention that no US passport record exists for Obama, until he was given a diplomatic passport as an Illinois Senator.
What is the “overwhelming evidence” that leads Gibbs, the press and now congress to conclude that Barack Hussein Obama meets the “natural born citizen” requirement to be Commander-in-Chief?
NO such evidence has been presented, as ALL Obama birth, adoption, college and passport records remain sealed as of this writing. What evidence are they talking about? The evidence that Obama is NOT a “natural born citizen” is beyond “overwhelming.”
So why the kindergarten debate…if Obama was born in the good ole’ USA, prove it.
The Founder’s used the “natural born citizen” clause to avoid any obvious conflicts in the Oval Office resulting from dual, divided or questionable loyalties to any foreign government or nation.
In Obama’s case, no matter whether he was born in Hawaii or Kenya, he cannot meet the Founder’s constitutional standard because he was born the son of an Arab-Muslim British subject from Africa, and therefore, has obvious dual or divided loyalties, which are now easily demonstrated by his “global agenda” at odds with American interests.
More at http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/13189 and http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=105341
0 Responses to “If Obama is a “Natural Born Citizen” – Why Can’t he Prove it?”